The search for agency within the enactive movement is nothing more or less than an attempt to find a basis for “we”. It is a search for that with which one identifies. The mistake of trying to ground it in a “we” made up of individual human animals is a problem. Agency lies wherever you shine the light. The agency of a dyad is real.
Furthermore, once one has chosen to identify a given domain as agentive, one creates a blindspot. Behind that, we must explain with non-observable constructs, like the shallow tinker toys of mechanistic psychology.