Let’s define an anti-embodied cognitive science.
We start, not by disagreeing with the enactivists, but by agreeing with them up to, but excluding agency. Let’s discard the assumption that the lived body is the locus of experience. That should get the party started.
Then we wait for someone to cry foul. We take their argument, whatever it is, and we examine its agential commitments, and associated mentalese. There is no test one can do to distinguish between the tumblebot and the goldfish without presuming some locus of agency. There will be many domains of relative autonomy though.
Take whatever ‘mind’ is offered, and call it the P-world. The domain of present experience. Identify the P-world in a variety of ways: Umwelt, milieu, consciousness. The P-bomb is, of course, that the P-world does not exist. It is a construct that allows the discussion of a world.
What’s the endgame? Do we no longer draw the boundary at the species? Is this the way to realize that we are the natural world? We are the world we see.